Skip to content
LiveRefs is on Product HuntSupport us →
refs
REF-3612Source onlineBlueprint rev 01

Why the Sun Looks Yellow: Cartoon Science Reversal

A fast vector explainer overturns a familiar belief with a visual test, then shows the atmospheric cause through colour-coded diagrams.

Maker @6807723105163871238For KurzgesagtOriginal post ↗
Cut timeline · 10 shots01:00
00:0000:1000:2000:3000:4000:5001:00
01020304050607080910

Field notes / why it works

The opening pairs an adorable yellow icon with a spoken contradiction by 0:02.5, then breaks the visual claim with signs and a colour wheel before the first measured cut at 0:08.7. A spectrum-to-white reveal at about 0:20 answers one question, while the question at 0:21.5 opens the atmospheric explanation; colour-coded rays, a counterfactual at 0:36, and a sunset extension keep the 60-second argument concrete.

01

Plate 01 / The format in one breath

A friendly cartoon asserts an everyday belief, then a spoken question overturns it in the first 2.5 seconds. A fast narrator walks through a literal visual experiment, explains the mechanism with colour-coded diagrams, and returns to the familiar appearance with a more precise answer. The payoff is understanding why the misconception seems true.

Why it works

  • At 0:00–0:03, the cute yellow object and the doubt in the narration create a contradiction before any setup.
  • At 0:08.7–0:21.5, a prism/rainbow becomes a white disc: the abstract correction is made visible before the atmospheric explanation.
  • At 0:21.5 the question renews curiosity; by 0:40.5 the answer reconnects the diagrams to everyday sight, then a sunset example extends the idea to 1:00.
02

Plate 02 / Format card

Platform · aspect · lengthTikTok · 9:16 · 720×1280 · 30 fps · 60.1 s
Pace10 measured shots, 9 certain cuts (9–11 cuts/min allowing two uncertain end flashes); 7 measured internal steps; 16 measured picture changes/min; mean shot 6.01 s, median 5.65 s. Continuous animation adds movement within holds.
Script193 spoken words · 194 wpm overall, 220 wpm during speech · 12 sentences, mean 16.1 words · 2 questions
VoiceOne low-register, quick, expressive narrator; close and conversational
On screenApproximately 100% original-looking flat vector motion graphics; no filmed presenter or screen recording
CaptionsSmall white sentence-case subtitles, dark outline/shadow, centred low; large illustrated labels only at key beats
SoundContinuous tonal bed about 18 dB below voice; accents likely on some cuts; −12.7 LUFS integrated, −0.2 dBFS true peak
StructureContradiction → visual proof → renewed question → mechanism → familiar-world payoff → vivid extension; no explicit CTA

Tools you'll need: Remotion for motion graphics · ElevenLabs or a recorded voice · Claude alone: yes

Frame by frame / measured

Stills taken at measured moments, each labelled with its time. Agents get the same sheets over MCP.

Hook, frame by frame: first 3 seconds at 0.25 s steps
Hook / first 3 s at 0.25 s steps
  1. Shots / one frame per shot1 sheet · Pro

Pro / 13 plates + recipe

The first plates are open. The full dissection is Pro.

Get the timed shots, type and sound specs, and the runnable recipe.

Open the full blueprint
  1. Plate 03 / The hook, frame by frame (first 3 seconds)Pro
  2. Plate 04 / Structure (beat sheet)Pro
  3. Plate 05 / Shot grammarPro
  4. Plate 06 / Visual style guidePro
  5. Plate 07 / Voice and deliveryPro
  6. Plate 08 / Sound designPro
  7. Plate 09 / PackagingPro
  8. Plate 10 / Script templatePro
  9. Plate 11 / Production planPro
  10. Plate 12 / PromptsPro
  11. Plate 13 / Edit recipePro
  12. Plate 14 / QA checklistPro
  13. Plate 15 / Make it yoursPro
  14. Recipe / runnable promptPro