Skip to content
refs
REF-2847Source onlineBlueprint rev 01

A NAND Gate That Adds 7 + 5

A text-led cinematic explainer turns an AI agent into logic gates, then reveals the cost and uncertainty of one addition.

Maker @mustafaakinOriginal post ↗
Cut timeline · 1 shots01:10
00:0000:1000:2000:3000:4000:5001:0001:10

Starter prompt / by Refs

The creator shared no short prompt. This is ours for making a film like it with Claude.

Direct a 70-second cinematic explainer about {PROJECT} ({WHAT_IT_DOES}) that feels like a brooding Christopher Nolan teaser. Frame everything in 2.39:1 letterbox with film grain and vignette, use slow push-ins on abstract three.js visuals such as logic gates lighting up and bits flowing through circuitry, and reveal the key numbers ({KEY_STATS}) one stark white title card at a time. Score it in code with a ticking clock, a rising Shepard tone and heavy brass hits, then render with headless Chrome and ffmpeg at 1920×1080.

Field notes / why it works

The quiet opening establishes an ordinary classifier by 0:00.5, then redefines the system as a NAND gate around 0:08–0:16. One gate grows into 116 at 0:27, and the 7 + 5 test leads to a stronger second reveal: a correct answer with only 84% compound confidence around 0:50, followed by 7.6 seconds and $0.0018 at 1:02.

01

Plate 01 / The format in one breath

An austere, silent-to-the-voice explainer asks an intelligent system to do a seemingly foolish primitive job, then shows how enough primitives perform a useful calculation. The progression is the hook: ordinary task → one tiny component → many components → concrete test → numerical uncertainty → cost and time.

Why it works

  • The first readable claim appears by 0:00.5 on a nearly black frame; the unusual premise arrives around 0:08–0:16.
  • Scale is revealed in steps: one gate at 0:11.7, a small circuit at 0:23.5, 116 gates at 0:27.4, then a 7 + 5 test at 0:31.3.
  • The resolution does not stop at “correct”: at 0:44–0:59, individual confidence becomes a surprisingly uncertain compound result. The final 7.6 seconds and $0.0018 give the abstraction a measurable price at 1:02.6.
02

Plate 02 / Format card

Platform · aspect · lengthX · 16:9, 1280×720, letterboxed internally to roughly 2.39:1 · 70.4 s · 30 fps
PaceDetector: one continuous shot, zero hard cuts, two major within-shot changes at 0:40.0 and 0:43.6. Visually, many restrained text/diagram reveals occur inside that shot; the detection metric undercounts those reveals.
ScriptNo spoken words. Roughly one short written claim per 4–8 seconds, with longer diagram holds.
VoiceNone; the written narrator is dry, technical and deadpan.
On screen100% designed typography, lines, dots and logic diagrams; no presenter, footage or product UI recording.
CaptionsNone. Centered sentence cards carry the entire explanation.
SoundTonal, music-like score; measured −18.2 LUFS integrated, −1.0 dBFS true peak. Tempo estimate 121 BPM, low confidence.
StructureOrdinary use → strange premise → gate → assembly → test → probability turn → cost/time → single-word end card. No CTA.

Pro / 13 plates + recipe

The first plates are open. The full dissection is Pro.

Get the timed shots, type and sound specs, and the runnable recipe.

Open the full blueprint
  1. Plate 03 / The hook, frame by frame (first 3 seconds)Pro
  2. Plate 04 / Structure (beat sheet)Pro
  3. Plate 05 / Shot grammarPro
  4. Plate 06 / Visual style guidePro
  5. Plate 07 / Voice and deliveryPro
  6. Plate 08 / Sound designPro
  7. Plate 09 / PackagingPro
  8. Plate 10 / Script templatePro
  9. Plate 11 / Production planPro
  10. Plate 12 / PromptsPro
  11. Plate 13 / Edit recipePro
  12. Plate 14 / QA checklistPro
  13. Plate 15 / Make it yoursPro
  14. Recipe / runnable promptPro